There is a solution...
6
month ban + Effective Signage = Viable Compromise
Since the primary complaint about the current 2-month pet
ban policy is that it does not cover the full 6 month summer
nesting season, we have suggested that the ban be expanded
to 6 months as an alternative to a year-round zero-tolerance
policy.
The image above illustrates our design for signs that will
clarify the rules for dog owners. The signs
in combination with our 6-month
compromise - and the planed increase
of the restricted wildlife area - should
have a significant impact on preservation while still allowing
some access to the family dog.
It has been pointed out that allowing dogs during the winter
months will still pose a threat to wintering shorebirds.
However, we still think this is a reasonable compromise
since there are far fewer visitors
during the winter months - and the consequences
of disturbing wintering shorebirds would be less
than during the critical summer nesting season - and the
proposed new signs would still serve to minimize intrusions
by dogs in the protected areas.
We showed
a "mockup" of our proposed signage solution
at the Sept. 11th 2007 County Commission meeting. Our proposal
ultimately failed - perhaps becaus we we unable to get enough
support from County staff. If you agree with our compromise
position, contact the county to
let them know..
|